Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 601 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $99.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.54 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100T - 193 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
183
94.81865284974094%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
69.23076923076923%
Price, $
$150
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
72.03592814371258%
Multi-Core
3178
54.85931296392198%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |