Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10400 - 62 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1430
82.70676691729322%
Multi-Core
5489
54.72582253240279%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |