Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 210 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $450.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.14 vs $2.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280304 minutes ago
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |