Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i3-4150 - 201 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $48.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 57% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-10400F - $0.24 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
42.85714285714285%
Price, $
$112.53
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
196
97.51243781094527%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
72.39221140472878%
Multi-Core
2047
35.59380977221353%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |