Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 15% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4370 - 195 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $82.8 vs $143.72
- Up to 34% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-10600K - $0.49 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
66.21621621621621%
Price, $
$143.72
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
169
86.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
73.58262967430639%
Multi-Core
2407
35.200350979818666%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |