Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $82.8 vs $113.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400F - $0.42 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i3-4370 - 210 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
198
94.28571428571428%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
77.77777777777777%
Price, $
$113
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
62.21315655277919%
Multi-Core
2407
31.63774973711882%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |