Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-4300 - 152 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $48.02 vs $133.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.4 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
45.45454545454546%
Price, $
$133
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349395 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
121
79.60526315789474%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |