Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1820 - 152 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $46.41 vs $133.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.38 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
43.18181818181818%
Price, $
$133
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
122
80.26315789473685%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
29.122182680901542%
Multi-Core
825
12.098548174219093%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |