Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4590S - 176 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590S
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $42.89 vs $113.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11400F - $0.26 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
40.625%
Price, $
$113
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
163
92.61363636363636%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1084
55.27791942886282%
Multi-Core
2951
38.78811777076761%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4590S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |