Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8300 - 154 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $47.98 vs $113.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11400F - $0.39 vs $0.73 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
53.42465753424658%
Price, $
$113
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349280 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
122
79.22077922077922%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |