Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3319 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3820 - 140 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $113.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3820 - $0.81 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
129
92.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
32.66129032258065%
Price, $
$319.88
35%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
31.463539010708825%
Multi-Core
2299
30.218191377497373%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |