Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 315 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $113.0 vs $265.49
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700 - $0.8 vs $1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - 148 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
44%
Price, $
$265.49
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |