Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 70 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $150.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $2.14 vs $4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349808 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
78.57142857142857%
Value, $/FPS
$4.91/FPS
43.58452138492872%
Price, $
$270
55%
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
55.32516493873704%
Multi-Core
6976
85.19785051294578%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |