Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 30% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-540 - 157 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $90.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600 - $0.74 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
77.08333333333334%
Price, $
$150
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
121
77.07006369426752%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
19.227144203581528%
Multi-Core
841
10.271128480703469%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |