Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9800X - 203 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $150.0 vs $545.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9800X - $0.74 vs $2.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
186
91.62561576354679%
Value, $/FPS
$2.93/FPS
25.25597269624573%
Price, $
$545
27%
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1368
64.4674835061263%
Multi-Core
7353
89.80214948705422%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |