Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $545.0 vs $567.98
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 24% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9800X - 131 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9800X - $4.34 vs $5.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9800X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280356 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$567.98
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |