Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 103% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 77 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $63.83 vs $198.9
- Up to 35% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-11600K - $1.68 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
65.11627906976743%
Price, $
$198.9
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
38
49.35064935064935%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
43.77859103385178%
Multi-Core
1975
23.02133115747756%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |