Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 204 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $135.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.75 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
77.31958762886599%
Price, $
$198.9
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
180
88.23529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
48.353156450137234%
Multi-Core
3294
38.39608345961067%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |