Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i3-7100 - 214 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $70.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 62% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.35 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
37.63440860215053%
Price, $
$198.9
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
92.99065420560748%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
57.0448307410796%
Multi-Core
2440
28.44154330341532%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |