Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than FX-4300 - 215 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $48.02 vs $160.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600KF - $0.25 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, $
$160.68
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
87.90697674418605%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |