Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1400 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $42.88 vs $160.68
- Up to 70% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600KF - $0.37 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
29.838709677419356%
Price, $
$160.68
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
116
89.23076923076924%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
949
43.21493624772314%
Multi-Core
3098
35.580567359595726%
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |