Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 3950X - 205 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $160.68 vs $515.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.78 vs $2.68 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
192
93.65853658536587%
Value, $/FPS
$2.68/FPS
29.1044776119403%
Price, $
$515
31%
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |