Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 418 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 181 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $515.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.85 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$515
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353901 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
95.02762430939227%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
92.53246753246754%
Price, $
$530
97%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
74.76525821596243%
Multi-Core
7454
69.68960359012715%
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |