Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-11600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than Core i5-11600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600T - 168 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600T - 32 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600T | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |