Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Core i7-10700F - 219 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $225.99 vs $244.85
- Up to 1% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13500 - $1.11 vs $1.12 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
99.10714285714286%
Price, $
$244.85
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348791 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
93.15068493150685%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
67.08281315022889%
Multi-Core
7231
58.56957719099304%
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |