Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 46% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-7100T - 245 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $66.82 vs $297.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-13600K - $0.4 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
32.786885245901644%
Price, $
$297.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
168
68.57142857142857%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
41.87617260787992%
Multi-Core
2260
15.220905172413794%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |