Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 67% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 2700 - 272 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $185.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 48% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-13600KF - $1.13 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
51.83486238532109%
Price, $
$593.77
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
163
59.92647058823529%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
40.55333090644339%
Multi-Core
5489
35.60817385663315%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |