Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 217 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $225.99 vs $593.77
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600KF - $1.18 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
43.06569343065693%
Price, $
$593.77
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348611 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
88.0184331797235%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348612 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
58.682198762286134%
Multi-Core
7231
46.90885501135258%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |