Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 252% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450 - 95 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $69.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 59% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13600KF - $2.56 vs $6.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.25/FPS
40.96%
Price, $
$593.77
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
27
28.421052631578945%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
21.951219512195124%
Multi-Core
1781
11.553681479078818%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |