Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220 - 217 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $79.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.47 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
17.153284671532845%
Price, $
$593.77
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348800 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
169
77.88018433179722%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348799 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
19.111758281761922%
Multi-Core
1085
7.038598767434317%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |