Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 4388 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - $70.0 vs $272.69
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 7700 - $1.59 vs $3.33 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 86% better in Starfield than Core i5-2400S - 82 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
44
53.65853658536586%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
47.74774774774775%
Price, $
$272.69
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
17.379117028731606%
Multi-Core
1352
9.130199891950298%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |