Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3588 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $70.0 vs $279.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 5900X - $1.59 vs $3.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 61% better in Starfield than Core i5-2400S - 71 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
44
61.97183098591549%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349456 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.93/FPS
40.458015267175576%
Price, $
$279
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
22.762735199632857%
Multi-Core
1352
11.37759824960027%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |