Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $70.0 vs $591.89
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.33 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 44% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-2400S - 300 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
209
69.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
16.751269035532996%
Price, $
$591.89
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
16.997943797121316%
Multi-Core
1352
6.886364793969338%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |