Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $70.0 vs $531.86
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - $0.33 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-2400S - 294 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
209
71.08843537414967%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
18.23204419889503%
Price, $
$531.86
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
16.683484695593677%
Multi-Core
1352
6.726033530670115%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |