Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3334 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $46.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.22 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-2405S - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
211
95.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349447 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
10.731707317073171%
Price, $
$450
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
30.94274146905726%
Multi-Core
1429
14.247258225324028%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |