Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4245 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $46.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-13100 - $0.27 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2405S - 206 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-2405S - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
169
82.03883495145631%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349401 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
37.50000000000001%
Price, $
$147.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
23.74611628939192%
Multi-Core
1429
19.476625323701786%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |