Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3719 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Core i5-2500K - 215 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $160.68 vs $390.81
- Up to 63% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-2500K - $0.75 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
191
88.83720930232558%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
36.585365853658544%
Price, $
$390.81
41%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
29.417122040072858%
Multi-Core
1921
22.062708165843574%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |