Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2550K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2550K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3013 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2550K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2550K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $99.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-10700F - $0.59 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-2550K - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2550K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2550K - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
FPS
168
93.85474860335195%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361206 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
46.82539682539682%
Price, $
$225.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Single-Core
680
42.18362282878412%
Multi-Core
2040
28.21186557875813%
Intel Core i5-2550K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |