Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4300 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $48.02 vs $69.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450 - $0.41 vs $0.57 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
71.9298245614035%
Price, $
$69
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350025 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350025 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |