Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $69.0 vs $113.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11400F - $1.5 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 46% better in Starfield than Core i5-3450 - 67 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
46
68.65671641791045%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349808 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
88.75739644970415%
Price, $
$113
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
30.749617542070375%
Multi-Core
1781
23.409568874868558%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |