Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-7100 - 258 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $70.0 vs $113.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11400F - $0.3 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
68.18181818181817%
Price, $
$113
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
233
90.31007751937985%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
63.59000509943906%
Multi-Core
2440
32.07150368033649%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |