Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3476 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $69.0 vs $350.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900KF - $0.62 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3450 - 134 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
83.5820895522388%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
23.66412213740458%
Price, $
$350.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
23.721479150275375%
Multi-Core
1781
11.968281701498555%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |