Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1884 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $69.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-7820X - $0.36 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i5-3450 - 201 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
191
95.02487562189054%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
19.25133689839572%
Price, $
$375
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
42.73564847625798%
Multi-Core
1781
22.690788635494968%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |