Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450S outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450S is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8120 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $78.02 vs $95.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450S - $0.67 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
84.81012658227847%
Price, $
$95
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350183 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |