Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450S outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450S is 964 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-750 - 459 vs 441 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $75.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3450S - $0.17 vs $0.21 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
459
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
80.95238095238096%
Price, $
$95
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350189 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
441
96.07843137254902%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |