Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 732 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3450S - 199 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $48.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3450S - $0.24 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
96.4824120603015%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
48.97959183673469%
Price, $
$95
50%
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350059 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
56.099903938520654%
Multi-Core
1681
82.12017586712261%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |