Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $95.0 vs $133.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10600KF - $0.79 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450S - 136 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
88.23529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
80.61224489795919%
Price, $
$133
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
34.63819691577699%
Multi-Core
1681
24.651708461651268%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |