Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-9100F - 236 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $115.0 vs $133.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.49 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280444 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
234
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |