Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2331 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $69.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900K - $0.62 vs $3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3470 - 124 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
112
90.32258064516128%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
16.445623342175068%
Price, $
$468
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
37.29016786570744%
Multi-Core
1840
23.115577889447238%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |