Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $69.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $0.4 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470 - 194 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
88.14432989690721%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349034 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
15.8102766798419%
Price, $
$490
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
35.56317895940537%
Multi-Core
1840
20.080759576557895%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |